66.31%
of indexed pages have zero external backlinks
Ahrefs, ~1 billion pages in Content Explorer — Search Engine Roundtable
#1 Trusted Link Building Agency in Australia
Client-side mix check
Count the anchors you already have. We will not sell a “safe percentage” as a ranking lever.
This calculator splits your live links into branded, exact, partial, generic/naked, and other. It is a mix check on your counts — client-side, no invented index. Over-exact profiles are a spam pattern we would flag on an audit. It is not a Google formula and not a ranking promise.
Enquire Now — quoted to the brief. No public DR grid.

By the numbers
66.31%
of indexed pages have zero external backlinks
Ahrefs, ~1 billion pages in Content Explorer — Search Engine Roundtable
10,000+
backlinks placed since the Richmond desk opened
20 days
maximum TAT on standard English guest posts
An anchor-ratio tool, here, is a calculator you run in the browser. You type how many live links you already have in each class. Worldwide Backlinks will show the share. We will flag when exact + partial exceeds a 40% rule of thumb we use internally on audits — not because Google published that number, but because exact-match-heavy vendor reports are a pattern we keep seeing on junk profiles. This is not a ranking model. It will not tell you that 12.4% branded “wins.” If you need new links, English guest posts from $125 include the anchor we actually placed, on the report. If you inherited a toxic mix, quote a link audit. Typical placement TAT about two weeks. The calculator is instant.
Count the live links you already have. This is a mix check — not a ranking formula and not a “safe %” we invented. Exact-match-heavy profiles are a common spam pattern. We still quote placements; we do not promise a SERP from a ratio.
| Type | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Branded | 8 | 44.4% |
| Exact match | 1 | 5.6% |
| Partial / phrase | 3 | 16.7% |
| Generic / naked | 4 | 22.2% |
| Other | 2 | 11.1% |
| Total | 18 | 100% |
This mix is not exact-match heavy on the 40% rule of thumb we use internally. Still not a ranking promise.
Branded: your name, product, or URL-as-brand. Exact match: the money keyword as the whole anchor. Partial / phrase: keyword plus filler. Generic / naked: “click here,” the raw URL, “website.” Other: images, brand+keyword leftovers, language you cannot bucket cleanly.
Over-optimised exact match was a 2012 story and is still a 2026 vendor habit. We prefer branded and partial on YMYL and on anything that looks like a money page. We still will not print a “Google wants 17% exact” table. Anyone selling that table is selling folklore.
The calculator does not fetch your backlinks. The backlink checker also will not invent an index. You count what you can see on a report you already trust — or you quote us to bucket it.
iGaming, health, and finance briefs get even more branded. Those verticals stay on their Enquire or quote-first desks. Do not use this toy to justify exact-match casino anchors at $125.
Tally the anchors. If exact is loud, stop buying that class before you add more.
Tell us branded vs partial on the quote. We will not stuff exact to hit a folklore %.
Different tools. This one is only mix.
01
Dropped URLs do not belong in the mix.
02
“Best CRM for dentists” is partial, not branded.
03
A heuristic we use on audits. Not a Google spec.
04
Disavow is last resort. New editorial is the usual fix.
05
English GP from $125. Anchors reported exactly.
Client-side counts and percentages
A 40% exact+partial heuristic (ours, labeled)
No ranking formula
No invented backlink index
Paths to audit and guest posts
A reminder that YMYL wants more branded
We will not sell a package of 50 exact-match “best cheap insurance” anchors. Healthcare and insurance stay quote-first with branded defaults. Casino stays on iGaming rates from $180 English.
Naked URL anchors are fine in a natural mix. They are not a loophole to hide exact match in the path.
No anchor-ratio SKU. English guest posts from $125 on pricing. Audits Enquire Now.
Quoted to the brief. Same white-hat QC. White-label uses the published rates plus branded reports — no extra SKU.
If a vendor sells a target pie chart, they are not quoting Google.
Swipe to compare every column →
| Criteria | This calculator | Safe-ratio package |
|---|---|---|
| Math | Your counts, your browser | A 2012 blog pie |
| Exact match | Flagged when loud | The SKU |
| Ranking claim | None | Implied |
| YMYL | More branded, still quoted | Same junk pie |
| Report | Exact anchor on live URLs | A target % |
| Next step | Audit or GP | 50 exact-match links |
DA checker and backlink checker for the other two honest tools. Link audit to bucket a real export. Guest posts to add editorial. AI backlinks if the brief is Overview-shaped.
Quote with the mix you just calculated.
There is no public Google spec. We flag exact+partial over 40% as a junk-vendor pattern. Branded-heavy is usual on YMYL.
No. Client-side only. Paste counts you already have.
Sometimes, sparingly, when the brief is not YMYL spam. We will not build a profile of them.
No. Mix check only.
No. Quote an audit and/or new editorial on the published card.
Put them in Other unless you have alt-text you trust.
Exact string on the live URL. DR, traffic estimate, followed/sponsored. Same as the rest of the site.
A few hops for crawlers and buyers — not a second sitemap in the footer.
Branded-heavy, reported exactly — or an audit if the old vendor already over-exacted you. Richmond VIC 3121 · 1 800 751 994 · support@worldwidebacklinks.com.