Editorial review
- Organic
- 2–5k org.
- Language
- English
- Niche
- SaaS / B2B
#1 Trusted Link Building Agency in Australia
Create · edit · cite — one desk
Creating a Wikipedia article is not a guest-post order and it is not a paid-link product. Wikipedia has rules: notability, independent reliable sources, and a neutral point of view. Worldwide Backlinks drafts and files pages against those rules. We will not promise the article stays live forever — volunteer reviewers can delete, draftify, or strip links. If a page we placed is dropped, we replace the work or re-file according to the brief. This is quoted, not a DR package. Enquire Now.

Cómo vetamos placements
Herramientas de QC que usamos — no logos de clientes ni endorsements falsos.
You approve the publisher
No live inventory dump. You see this class of site before we pitch. Named URLs land on the delivery report after go-live. Packaged English guest posts can be ordered in the client portal or requested on the quote form.
Editorial review
DACH trade site
JP resource
ES magazine
Open a real landing — not a catalog filter
Languages
Adult, CBD, and crypto open their Enquire Now industry pages — not the English GP grid. Every language chip opens its English-label landing. German money URLs stay in the footer and on /de.
No monthly minimum. The quote form on this page prefills the service. Wikipedia, adult, CBD, crypto, and directories are Enquire Now. Full tables live on pricing.
Quoted to the brief. Same white-hat QC. White-label uses the published rates plus branded reports — no extra SKU.
This page covers create, edit, and citations on one URL. A new Wikipedia article is an encyclopedia entry. It has to summarise what independent, reliable publications have already said about a notable subject. It is not a company bio, a launch announcement, or a place to park a dofollow backlink. Outbound links on Wikipedia are nofollow. Anyone selling “Wikipedia DR90 links” as a ranking hack is selling you a misunderstanding — or a page that will be deleted.
How to create a Wikipedia page, in the real sense: establish that the subject meets notability (significant coverage in multiple independent sources), gather those sources, write in a dispassionate voice, declare conflict of interest where it applies, and submit through the process Wikipedia actually uses — Articles for Creation, a draft, or a direct mainspace publication only when that is appropriate. Skipping those steps is how pages die in hours.
We act as a third-party researcher and drafter, not as your in-house PR team posting from a brand account. Callum Sherwood’s company has run this desk since 2022 alongside the link-building work, with people in Australia, Singapore, and the Philippines. Wikipedia does not run on our 20-day guest-post TAT. Reviewers move when they move. We will tell you if the source pile is too thin to try. We would rather lose the job than file a doomed draft.
If the page already exists, the brief is Wikipedia editing: sourced updates, citation fixes, NPOV cleanup — not a second article. Independent coverage that later underwrites notability is closer to digital PR than to a stack of sponsored posts.
You already have substantial independent press: national newspapers, trade journals, books, or academic cites. If the only sources are your website, a press release wire, and LinkedIn, you are not ready. We will say that on the quote call.
The value is a stable, cited public record and the visibility of a Wikipedia URL. It is not a DR bump. If you came here from a “buy Wikipedia backlinks” ad, read the honesty section below before you pay anyone — including us.
You can white-label other link work at the same GP/NE rates. Wikipedia is still Enquire Now and still has to meet notability. We will not put a client logo on a draft that Wikipedia would reject.
01
We read what already exists. Independent coverage is the gate. Affiliated blogs, sponsored posts, and your own guest articles do not count. If the audit fails, we stop and you are not billed for a fantasy page.
02
We propose section structure from the sources, not from your marketing site. Paid editing and COI have disclosure norms on Wikipedia. We work inside those norms rather than trying to hide the relationship.
03
No superlatives, no “leading provider,” no call-to-action. Every contentious fact gets an inline citation. We write as if a sceptical reviewer will try to delete the draft tomorrow — because they might.
04
We file the draft and respond to reviewer comments with sources, not arguments. If the page is declined or later deleted, we do not pretend it is still live. Replacements or a re-file are part of the engagement when the drop is on us — not a guarantee that Wikipedia will host the article forever.
Notability and independent-source audit before drafting
Neutral, cited draft written against Wikipedia’s rules
Conflict-of-interest handling rather than stealth editing
Submission and response to reviewer comments
Honest status reporting — live, draft, declined, or deleted
Replacement or re-file if a page we placed is dropped
Quoted fee — not English GP rates, not a DR grid
Wikipedia is run by volunteers. They delete advertising. They delete poorly sourced biographies. They delete companies that only exist in their own press releases. Paying Worldwide Backlinks does not buy immunity from that. Anyone who guarantees a Wikipedia URL “for life” is either lying or planning to sockpuppet until they get caught.
What we can stand behind: we work against the rules (notability, NPOV, reliable sources, no undisclosed paid spam). We do not add promotional dofollow schemes. If a page or citation we were responsible for is dropped, we replace or re-work it on a comparable basis. We cannot force the Wikimedia community to keep an article that fails their tests after the fact.
Nofollow is expected. If your KPI is “ranking power from a wiki link,” buy guest posts on the published table ($125–$350 English) instead. If your KPI is a public encyclopedic entry, stay here and accept the slower, stricter process. Building 1, 658 Church Street, Richmond VIC 3121 · 1 800 751 994 · support@worldwidebacklinks.com.
The market is full of “Wikipedia backlink” sellers. Most of that inventory is paid links stuffed into articles, or new pages that read like brochures. We will not compete on that. The contrast is the product.
| Criteria | Worldwide Backlinks | Wiki spam vendors |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | A notable, sourced encyclopedia article | A URL that looks like Wikipedia |
| Sources | Independent reliable publications | Press wires and owned blogs |
| Voice | Neutral point of view | Marketing copy |
| Link policy | No paid-link guarantees; nofollow expected | Sold as a DR90 backlink |
| If it is deleted | Replacement / re-file, honestly reported | Silence, or a new sockpuppet |
| Pricing | Enquire Now, quoted to the subject | Cheap packages, high deletion rate |
Creation starts from a red link or a missing topic. Editing starts from an article that already has a history, talk page, and often watchers. Mixing the two is how COI editors get blocked. If Acme Corp already has a page with a wrong founding date, that is an edit. If Acme Corp has never had a page, that is creation — and notability must be proven from scratch. We handle both on this URL so you do not get a doorway clone for “how to edit a Wikipedia page.”
Citations have to support the article as a whole. Dumping a stack of your own guest posts as “sources” will get the draft declined. We look for newspapers, books, regulator filings, and independent magazines. Ahrefs DR of those sources is irrelevant; Wikipedia does not rank domains the way SEOs do. Paid editors and people with a conflict of interest are expected to disclose that connection. We disclose and we work as an outside desk, not as a sockpuppet for the subject.
Typical editing briefs we accept: a wrong founding year, a missing independent award already covered in reliable press, a dead citation, promotional adjectives that should never have been in the article. Typical briefs we refuse: inserting a commercial URL as a “reference,” deleting competitors, inflating claims, and turning the infobox into an advert. Turnaround is not the ~2 week guest-post clock. A source audit can be days. Reviewer queues can be weeks.
Prove notability with independent reliable sources, write a neutral draft with inline citations, handle conflict of interest transparently, and submit through Wikipedia’s actual process (often Articles for Creation). We do that as a paid research-and-draft service. We do not bypass reviewers.
No. Wikipedia volunteers can delete or rewrite anything. We work against the rules and replace work if a page we placed is dropped. Forever-live guarantees are not something an honest desk can sell.
They are nofollow. The benefit is visibility, trust, and a citation graph — not a cheap DR bump. For ranking-focused links, use guest posts or niche edits on the published USD tables.
Enquire Now. It is not DR20 $125 and it is not a package on the guest-post grid. Price depends on source complexity, language, and whether notability is already obvious.
No. We will tell you the source gap. Buying more guest posts does not automatically create Wikipedia notability, especially if those posts are sponsored.
Yes — on this same URL. Sourced updates, citation fixes, and NPOV cleanup for pages that already exist. Creation and editing share Wikipedia’s rules but not the same workflow; tell us which you need on the quote form. Wikipedia is preselected.
We follow Wikipedia’s rules rather than fighting them with sockpuppets. Paid editing still has disclosure expectations. If you want undisclosed spam, we are the wrong vendor.
If the sources are thin, we will say so. If they are strong, we will quote page creation against Wikipedia’s rules — without a forever-live fairy tale. 1 800 751 994 · support@worldwidebacklinks.com · Richmond VIC 3121.